Search found 52 matches
- Thu Apr 13, 2023 10:19 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 684
Re: Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
THX for clarification! I will try to remove the not needed modules.
- Thu Apr 13, 2023 8:39 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 684
Re: Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
O.k., I had (as in the past) selected Skalarki support also on my main PC, I will make a new install without. Btw: Tbh I never understood if and for what FSUIPC support is needed, therefore I ticked it on all PCs. I it only needed if I use FSUIPC offsets and only on the Main PC or also on those wher...
- Thu Apr 13, 2023 7:47 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 684
Hardware Connect error with B58.0.2
After installation of B 58.0.2 I get the error message from HardwareConnect.exe as attached. Question is, if I need HardwareConnect.exe on my Main PC. Only my Side Sticks and my pedals are connected to this PC via USB. All Skalarki Hardware is connected to another PC, where HardwareConnect.exe runs ...
- Sat Mar 04, 2023 1:09 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Sidestick Priority
- Replies: 0
- Views: 953
Sidestick Priority
Hi, is that description of the behavior of the sidestick priority pushbuttons on the sticks correct: „A pilot can deactivate the other stick and take full control by pressing and keeping pressed his priority takeover push button. For latching the priority condition, it is recommended to press the ta...
- Wed Jan 18, 2023 9:30 am
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Overhead not connected
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3928
Re: Overhead not connected
I can confirm from time to time I also have the issue of a freezing OHP since last weeks. I will observe that to supply further details.
- Sat Jan 14, 2023 4:01 pm
- Forum: 3rd Party Software
- Topic: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11477
Re: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
Affirmative
- Sat Jan 14, 2023 3:30 pm
- Forum: 3rd Party Software
- Topic: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11477
Re: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
any idea?bbruechmann wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 3:09 pm...
i have a little tool it´s called "Flightmanager" ...
- Sat Jan 14, 2023 9:50 am
- Forum: 3rd Party Software
- Topic: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11477
Re: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
Hi Bernd, wonderful, THX for declaration!
- Fri Jan 13, 2023 9:40 am
- Forum: 3rd Party Software
- Topic: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
- Replies: 35
- Views: 11477
Re: pero | corteManager4JeeHell
@Bernd By the risk that it is going to be off topic: How do you solve the problem to load the bus and calculate the takeoff performance data depending on the correct TOW when planning with SimBrief? The only reason I (and, as I know, many others) still use the combo of PFPX and TOPCAT is, that one o...
- Tue Jan 03, 2023 3:37 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Found a NEO Merge
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4351
Re: Found a NEO Merge
The Stall Problem seems to be a Problem by Topcat Profile. With Special Weight an Balance parameter loaded in the Sim via Topcat all Jeehell Models have Strange behavier.(but i don’t figured out the Special Problem or the Parameters, that causes the Problem) A Bacup by a clean FMGS Aircraft.cfg sol...
- Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:03 am
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Found a NEO Merge
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4351
Re: Found a NEO Merge
After the experience with the merge I fear you might be right. In my setup with the normal CFM and IAE the problem disappeared after changing the simpatchConfig.ini https://jeehell.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=222#p222 , but perhaps it was only coincidentally, as it seems not to have that effect on the...
- Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:28 pm
- Forum: General Discussions
- Topic: Found a NEO Merge
- Replies: 11
- Views: 4351
Re: Found a NEO Merge
Works in principle, but on final approach the merge shows a behaviour as if simpatcher.dll would not be connected (while P3D Addons menu shows it is actually connected and airfile is o.k.): VApp is in red band, would stall with it, impossible to land with normal speed. Schade drum, not usable theref...
- Thu Dec 29, 2022 2:29 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: Forum login not working on iOS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 690
Re: Forum login not working on iOS
Working normal here.
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:46 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
Just landed, works without problems now, THX for your support and bringing me to the right idea. Will fly to see Santa with it on VATSIM tomorrow, have a merry XMas!
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:58 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
You won´t believe - seems to work now. T.O. config Test successful, no CG warning. Will TO now.
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:26 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
Maybe I got it running now: Exchanged simpatchConfig.ini with the one of B 57.1.2. The one of B 57.2.0 has sleepTime=50000, the one of B 57.1.2 has sleepTime=120000. Now I get
Simpatcher B57.2
Airfile OK
in P3D addons menu. I will make a test flight now.
Simpatcher B57.2
Airfile OK
in P3D addons menu. I will make a test flight now.
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 4:56 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
Affirmative, in both versions same file from 30.05.2017 23:50:00 94 KB
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 4:11 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
Both make a log, see attachment (files renamed). Flight with B57.1.2 was successful. With B57.2.0 still no entrances of Simpatcher in P3D addons menu.
- Fri Dec 09, 2022 2:07 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
Checked it: With B57.1.2 in the P3D addons menu I have 2 entrances: Simpatcher B57.1 Airfile OK With B57.2.0 both is missing. The add-on.xml in C:\Users\youruser\Documents\Prepar3D v4 Add-ons\jeehell\ in both cases is the same, the path points to A320FMGS\SimPatch\SimPatcher.dll. SimPatcher.dll in B...
- Thu Dec 08, 2022 4:35 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
Re: CG issue since B 57.1.4
THX, will check.
- Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:43 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: CG issue since B 57.1.4
- Replies: 13
- Views: 2364
CG issue since B 57.1.4
I flew the WorldFlight as member of Team JeeHell A320 with version B57.1.2 without any problems. As I did not make any updates during World Flight, I missed version B57.1.3 After updating to B 57.1.4 the following (fatal) problem occurs and is still present with B57.2.0: I plan my flights including ...
- Mon Nov 14, 2022 8:54 am
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: PTU sound
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1780
Re: PTU sound
THX, Mato, for the advice. Unfortunately seems the lite version is discontinued and not available any more and the remaining versions will work only with those named payware products, if I do not misunderstand that.
- Sun Nov 13, 2022 10:06 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: PTU sound
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1780
Re: PTU sound
found hte bug wiht PTU will be fixed in next releaes. V1 was removed though and will not come back, it has disappeared from the FWC in the A320 family as far as I know. THX, JL! As mentioned, I think, it is consequently to remove the V1 call, as in reality it has to come from a human and not from a...
- Sun Nov 13, 2022 5:27 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: PTU sound
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1780
- Sun Nov 13, 2022 3:36 pm
- Forum: Software support
- Topic: PTU sound
- Replies: 12
- Views: 1780
Re: PTU sound
Just updated to B57.1.4 and still the same - no PTU sound. Other sounds over same sound devices are working, volume 100 %. Checked it on other PCs, same result. Seems as if not triggered by Server. And what I remarked in addition: No V1 call (not needed with a real PM, but that is not the question)....